jueves, 16 de abril de 2020
Reflection on LTE
First session Reflection
This course session raises awareness of teaching development. Through the conference, we could explore and discuss issues regarding the educational context around Colombia and different countries.
One of the most significances for me have been the following:
- The history of the foreign language from 40´s century until nowadays
- The role of the teacher
- Independent and Renewal professionalism
- Current Approaches and Practices
The history mentioned by the professor its quite relevant for me as it leads me to know from where the English as a foreign language started moving on into the classroom. once of the issues was the War II in the 40´s century, from there, start the new tendencies in terms of teaching and learning practices. Furthermore, speaking and listening skills for communication around the war start emerging from that time.
On the other hand, the role of the teacher on the learners´ learning process has important relevance as well, for example, the teacher as a passive technician in which they contract knowledge and transmit to students. Also, teachers as reflective practitioners and teachers as transformative intellectuals. However, it is quite interesting to think that those approaches are not wrong or right, but those can be adopted and adapted according to students' needs.
Similarly, independent and renewal professionalism emerge from the readings. According to Leung, C. (2009). it has to be with reflective action and personal choices teachers make in order to improve their practice. it also has to be with an alternative perspective around practice setting
In the same vein, we as a teacher are constantly inquiring about new practices and tendencies in the educational context. However, it is pretty interesting to see the new approaches and practices to be researchers in a classroom. Moreover, teachers with a sense of independent professionalism would raise awareness in knowing the real purpose of teaching certain topics in the classroom.
Second session Reflection
The second session was developed through the following salient trends for me:
1. Positioning theory in LTE
2. Pre-service experiences within teaching practicum
3. Teachers´ pedagogical knowledge
4. Transformation of pedagogical knowledge
In regards to the pre-service teacher in the teaching practicum, there are a lot of research reports, let's think about the research report by professor Castañeda and Aguirre, a report that makes me think about the importance of the practicum in the undergraduate programs, especially for pre-service teachers development. Also, this article raises my awareness in terms of the relation between practicum and school realities to understand the best tendencies to be taught in the classroom.
On the other hand, teachers as facilitator and center models. Thus, it is important for us as teachers to make personal connections by showing an interest in each student. This is not only achieved
through talking and sharing thoughts, but also through encouraging each student. also, listen to pre-service teachers' experiences in order to improve another practicum at Universities.
The contributions from these articles have emerged to think that pedagogical experiences can contribute to language teaching education, teachers educators should pay more attention to a student teacher in order to see the positioning and understand the necessities and the new issues that can be researched.
In the same vein, teachers´ pedagogical knowledge, the questions made by the presenter in regards to how do we as teachers learn to teach? this question makes me think that I learn to teach teaching when I started my carrier as an English teacher I had a lot conception about how to handle a class, but when I started realizing that I was going to learn to teach teaching it was a surprise for me. Also, that made me think that we as teachers learn the pedagogical and strategies in the undergraduate program what it's quite interesting. However, teachers educators have to make a revision of their classes in order to be coherence between realities and practicum.
Finally, the connection between pedagogical knowledge and its transformation. Thus, according to the once who presented this topic the importance of research in our pedagogical practice. In the same vein, the relation between teacher knowledge and critical thinking. Quintero (2016) states" transform already exiting knowledge to knowledge itself". From this sense, these are connected to the transformation we as the teacher can do according to new insights in the different educational settings.
To sum up, the importance of the different topics presented by the teacher and peers in order to have new insights in an educational setting. Also, I opened my mind to new issues in a way that could be researched in our context.
To sum up, the importance of the different topics presented by the teacher and peers in order to have new insights in an educational setting. Also, I opened my mind to new issues in a way that could be researched in our context.
Third session Reflection
In this session, we as master students could give our voice in the US schooling and listen to the perception US students have about the schooling in Colombia, this exercise was quite interesting in the sense we could interchange our perception about others and self.
On the other hand, the presentation was in the line of technology that it´s interesting because it´s the situation we are living nowadays with education and the virtuosity. Also, topics such as the need to unveil what happens in initial language teacher education and in-service teachers.
In this line of thought, the idea of any single teacher has the same opportunities, some have the possibilities to study abroad some like me. I had the possibility to study at a national local context. However, I had the possibility to see different situations during my practicum what it is interesting to take into account in our teacher development. Also, the language proficiency issues that we can discuss in our context, and the discourse in order to overcome those barriers and to see beyond the language and become more practical consciousness, as well as being conscious of who we are in relation to others.
In the sense of technology, I can say that technology has made a lot of changes in the educational setting. Hence, the change that could emerge from this quarantined time education is living it is something that really made me think because I am sure the new researches are going to emerge in term of technology and education, furthermore, the importance of taking into account situations lived by the public sector in Colombia, as we know there are students do not have the access to technology and that made it challenging for the teacher as well as students. From that sense, the importance of we as teachers search for the best strategies to handle education and virtuality.
Finally, all the topics studied during these three sessions have been important to my professional development as well as critical events that some of us lived in our undergraduate programs and that we are living in our master's program. Thus, the importance of those experiences to grow up professionally.
sábado, 4 de abril de 2020
Autoethnography
Autoethnography
Several factors
influence language teaching. Through years, some authors have researched teachers'
behavior in the educational setting. There have been strategies used for
teacher to reflect, one of them has been “autoethnography”. According to Spry
(2001) states “autoethnography is a self-narrative that critiques the situatedness
of self with others in social, political, economic and cultural context”
(p.710). Thus, this paper shows narratives through pedagogy in different contexts.
In doing so, to make the teacher aware of the teaching process, it is a need to
figure out support language teaching and students´ elements as an ongoing
process influenced by the teacher. In consequence, based on components of methodology
for language practice that is shaped in the classroom practice, these are good
reasons through the real training and the real overview of this paper and
practice together for making formative learning in the context of education.
Being a student teacher
When I entered my undergraduate program, I was 16
years old. Once I started improving the foreign language I began learning
pedagogy at teaching. It was a new experience for me as from the beginning
there were strategies and methodologies to carry out in the classroom. In my
second semester, I was in an elective course. To be honest, I do not remember
its name but I remember the one who guided it. She was a teacher called Janeth.
She arrived in the classroom and started asking students why had we chosen “Licenciatura
en ingles”. I say this in Spanish because that was a Spanish elective course.
Several peers answered they were there because of the language. The teacher
started making us realize the pedagogy in the undergraduate program, it was
quite interesting for me as it made me think and be aware of the what of the
program. Like that experience, there were lots of experiences through my
learning process as a student's teacher.
How that teacher made me reflect on teaching
in a classroom, it is the way we as a student-teacher start our career in the
educational setting. like me, I pretty sure there were lots of peers that felt
they had to change the way of think and the way of seeing the program, for example, Farrel,
T. (2016) features reflection “as a means for improving classroom processes and
outcomes, and developing confident, self-motivated teachers” (p.51). After a
few pedagogy moments later as a student-teacher, the practicum came in the program,
and I realized the pedagogy in the course.
My first experience at primary
I entered into a class of first-grade. The students
were in a regular class from their principal teacher. There were about 40
students whose ages ranged from six to eight years old. They seemed to be a
crowded class. Once I arrived in class the principal teacher introduced me and
I started the class. I had lots of expectations for the class. First, the
principal teacher helped me gave students’ the first sheet. So, they were a bit
more organized. However, no that much as I expected. Some students asked me what
they were going to do. I told them they had to wait for the instruction. Once,
I finished giving them the worksheets. I taught them the vocabulary, they
repeated after me. Then, I remember, there were lots of questions and concerns
from the students about the worksheet. I tried to answer everyone but it was
almost impossible. The principal teacher helped me with the students’
discipline. Then I told all the students to practice the last time before
finish the class. Finally, the bell rang and my period of the day was over.
My experience of teaching English at first grade taught me more of what I have learned from my practicum about student classroom management and I realized new ways of teaching a group of 40 students. First of all, I learned some strategies for students in classroom management. I learned an easy strategy in that class, for example, I should explain the activity before giving students the worksheets. Then, I should give everyone the copies, it means once I started the instructions they paid attention to. From that class, I felt I was learning how to teach through the practice. Thus, Loughran, J. (2005) illustrates “teaching and learning are demanding tasks because they center on complex, interrelated sets of thoughts and actions, all of which may be approached in several ways" (p.3). In that sense, the pedagogical experience at primary enriched me to know, this is not easy work, but it is grateful to know what the students can achieve through their learning process.
My pedagogy teaching at primary
It was my first time teaching at primary full time,
it was in 2017. I taught third, fourth, and fifth grades from a public
institution. Before any class, I took my time to prepare very well the class, I
was going over the computer to find the best activities which fixed the
students' context. There were lots of fun activities, puzzles, worksheets, and
games throughout that year. I opened some sites and tried to find some
materials for the day’s lesson. For that class, I found an image material
on the topic and download it on the desktop. I got the material printed and
then photocopied for each student. It seemed students were enjoying the class.
Some classes I asked students to bring cardboard, some color pencils, markers,
print papers, or some other materials. I welcomed students in the class. Then,
I warmed up the classes with movement activities. Later on, I introduced the
topic of the day by an image or by writing on the whiteboard. Then, I
distributed some worksheets to each student and asked them to fill it. Some
other class, they had to cut on and paste or match. I let them time to finish
the activities. I facilitated them while they needed my help during the time
they were doing it. Some of them finished within the stipulated time, but
some other finished before, it meant I had a plan b for those students. Then I
provided them the space to finish the activities. At the end of each session,
the whole class says what they had learned.
From that experience, I was much aware of the teaching materials and activities I used for my classes. After, my first experience teaching at primary. I got the idea of activities based on teaching through various interactions in the classroom. As Farrel, T. (2016) mentions “the general consensus is that teachers who are encouraged to engage in reflective practice can gain new insight of their practice” (p.224). Bearing in mind this idea, I think the way we learn to teach is acquired and constructed through teaching. So, I tried my best to provide the situation to the students to learn at the same time I learned in the practice.
From that experience, I was much aware of the teaching materials and activities I used for my classes. After, my first experience teaching at primary. I got the idea of activities based on teaching through various interactions in the classroom. As Farrel, T. (2016) mentions “the general consensus is that teachers who are encouraged to engage in reflective practice can gain new insight of their practice” (p.224). Bearing in mind this idea, I think the way we learn to teach is acquired and constructed through teaching. So, I tried my best to provide the situation to the students to learn at the same time I learned in the practice.
My pedagogy teaching at secondary
My first experience teaching in secondary was in
2018, I was over the computer googling and planning my lessons for eighth,
tenth, and eleventh grades. I searched for the “PEI” from the institution to
start my journey in high school. There were lots of expectations for teaching
adolescents. I opened some sites and found some materials and activities for my
first lesson. I found some activities for breaking the ice, it was interesting.
When I came into the class, it was excited about the eleventh grade as I knew
that students ages were growing and adapting to new behaviors. During that
year, I felt I was very strict with the students, for example, I facilitated
them all they needed, my help during the time they were in class. I enfaced
them to be on time and bring the works until the deadline time. Sometimes,
there were not more chance, and some other strict rules. However, the
experience has taught me that we have to go beyond merely teaching
knowledge. Nowadays, I know students' needs, likes not only in terms of
knowing but also in terms of being.
My experience of teaching English in high school taught me more about
how to manage students’ likes and needs more than just teach knowledge. I feel
that experience helped me to be more flexible enough to bring and implement new
practices. Nowadays, I apply the way make feel the students better, in that way
they learn better in the classroom. Herein,
let me examine one
claim of Osborn, T. A. (2000) in his text on building critical reflection on
the classroom. He says "critical reflection involves challenging the
boundaries of our educational thought and practice" (p.66). Bearing in
mind this quote, I state we as teachers acquired a lot of pedagogical
knowledge, but the real practice makes us know how to teach in the
classroom.
My experience in the master´s program in
English Language teaching
During this master's program, I have grown up a lot, not only personally, but also professionally. To be honest the difficult stages for me have been the research courses. However, the M.A has emerged me into the research, I have to say this road has not been easy. Contrary, it has been a hard route. Anyway, this process enhances me to continue working in my pedagogy practice and the research field. Furthermore, the master´s program has opened the window of research and the way of constructing new strategies in the classroom. This empowered me to transform students' realities in the classroom, school, or society.
During this master's program, I have grown up a lot, not only personally, but also professionally. To be honest the difficult stages for me have been the research courses. However, the M.A has emerged me into the research, I have to say this road has not been easy. Contrary, it has been a hard route. Anyway, this process enhances me to continue working in my pedagogy practice and the research field. Furthermore, the master´s program has opened the window of research and the way of constructing new strategies in the classroom. This empowered me to transform students' realities in the classroom, school, or society.
Bearing in
mind the question by professor Castañeda in this master´s course. He said “what
opportunities have you had to externalize everyday concepts and internalize
academic concepts?”. From this question, there were a lot of opportunities
created by this master. First of all, each course´s teacher created their
strategies to internalize the concepts and carry them out to the practice. So, this
program is created in the way we can think critically not only in the theory
but also in the practice.
In the same line of
thought, one of the most significant findings that have emerged from this
master´s program has been understanding the environment that students are
exposed to, to create better learning outcomes, for example, those factors that
the learner develop by him/herself. Contrary, those factors that are developed by
teachers through the process in the classroom or school.
Also, through the learning process I could strongly
believe the teacher is an agent of changes in the education system, the teacher
promotes positive interaction. To make students feel comfortable with
themselves and the language. In my opinion, I as teacher educator may play
roles in the students learning that everyone can achieve, it is for this
reason, that teachers have to act to facilitate students learning.
On the other hand, I believe Colombia's policy has
increased students' opportunities to have a better education system. However,
we as teachers are the center to make students transformations in the classroom
or school. These demand huge efforts by the teachers as well as the local
education system that need to be cover progressively in the educational
field.
Finally, to answer the following questions,
(a) who were you? (b) who are you? (c) who will you be? I look back to my
experience as a teacher and a learner. I have reshaped the way of think,
belief, act, and understand situations that we as teachers have to live in this
profession. Thus, appreciate the process throughout this program. Furthermore,
I have to mention the gap I close day by day between the B.A and this master´s
program. Also, there have been assumptions and personal situations and unveiled
realities that I have to overcome to be at the end of this grateful mater´s
program.
Farrel, T. (2016). The practices of encouraging TESOL teachers to engage
in reflective practice: An appraisal of recent research
contributions Garvey
Loughran, J. (2005). Developing Reflective Practice:
Learning about Teaching and Learning through
Modelling. Falmer Press.
Osborn, T. A. (2000). Critical Reflection and the
Foreign Language Classroom. London: HMSO.
Spry, T. (2001). Performing autoethnography:
An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative.Inquiry,
7, pp706 – 732.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)